sdkrystian wrote: > I've been hinted though that Clang may be incorrect in accepting explicit > specializations of a templated static class data member in the class scope. > It looks like with all the restrictions in the standard it may only be > allowed to place explicit specializations of a templated static class data > member outside of the class.
@alexfh What makes you say that? I think the resolution of [CWG727](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/727.html) quite clearly permits class scope explicit specializations of function templates, class templates, and static data member templates. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93873 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
