================
@@ -115,6 +116,18 @@ GlobalVariable *replaceBuffer(CGHLSLRuntime::Buffer &Buf) {
} // namespace
+llvm::Type *CGHLSLRuntime::convertHLSLSpecificType(const Type *T) {
+ assert(T->isHLSLSpecificType() && "Not an HLSL specific type!");
+
+ // Check if the target has a specific translation for this type first.
+ if (llvm::Type *TargetTy = CGM.getTargetCodeGenInfo().getHLSLType(CGM, T))
+ return TargetTy;
+
+ // TODO: What do we actually want to do generically here? OpenCL uses a
+ // pointer in a particular address space.
+ llvm_unreachable("Generic handling of HLSL types is not implemented yet");
----------------
damyanp wrote:
At what point will this become something we need to do? Is there an issue
tracking it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97362
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
