================ @@ -115,6 +116,18 @@ GlobalVariable *replaceBuffer(CGHLSLRuntime::Buffer &Buf) { } // namespace +llvm::Type *CGHLSLRuntime::convertHLSLSpecificType(const Type *T) { + assert(T->isHLSLSpecificType() && "Not an HLSL specific type!"); + + // Check if the target has a specific translation for this type first. + if (llvm::Type *TargetTy = CGM.getTargetCodeGenInfo().getHLSLType(CGM, T)) + return TargetTy; + + // TODO: What do we actually want to do generically here? OpenCL uses a + // pointer in a particular address space. + llvm_unreachable("Generic handling of HLSL types is not implemented yet"); ---------------- damyanp wrote:
At what point will this become something we need to do? Is there an issue tracking it? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97362 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits