================
@@ -1122,10 +1131,20 @@ void
GenericTaintChecker::taintUnsafeSocketProtocol(const CallEvent &Call,
}
/// Checker registration
-void ento::registerGenericTaintChecker(CheckerManager &Mgr) {
+void ento::registerTaintPropagationChecker(CheckerManager &Mgr) {
Mgr.registerChecker<GenericTaintChecker>();
}
+bool ento::shouldRegisterTaintPropagationChecker(const CheckerManager &mgr) {
+ return true;
+}
+
+void ento::registerGenericTaintChecker(CheckerManager &Mgr) {
+ GenericTaintChecker *checker = Mgr.getChecker<GenericTaintChecker>();
+ checker->isTaintReporterCheckerEnabled = true;
+ checker->reporterCheckerName = Mgr.getCurrentCheckerName();
----------------
steakhal wrote:
I see. This is really unfortunate.
WDYT about hard-coding the checker name, as a string, and asserting that it's
the same as the one in checkers td inside the register checker call, with a
comment stating that you should also update the BugType accordingly.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98157
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
