mgorny added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26796#632602, @compnerd wrote:
> This would need an upgrade path, since the output name can actually be > different from the `AchTypeName` (e.g. i386 vs i686). I was considering committing this alongside with the i686 removal, and assuming that people are going to upgrade clang and compiler-rt in lockstep. Is there any other case that needs explicit consideration? Do you have another suggestion on handling this? https://reviews.llvm.org/D26796 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
