sgilles marked an inline comment as done.
sgilles added a comment.
Thanks to danielmarjamaki and rsmith for comments, which I think this diff
addresses. I have not done an extensive search of the codebase for places
where `isSyntacticForm()` would be useful, but there don't seem to be any
callers of `getSyntacticForm()` which used it in the way I did, so I believe
that is okay.
================
Comment at: lib/AST/Expr.cpp:1887
+bool InitListExpr::isIdiomaticZeroInitializer(const LangOptions &LangOpts)
const {
+ assert(!getSyntacticForm() && "only test syntactic form as zero
initializer");
+
----------------
rsmith wrote:
> `!isSyntacticForm()` would be preferable here instead of
> `!getSyntacticForm()`.
I believe `isSyntacticForm()` makes sense here - please correct me if I've
misunderstood.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28148
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
