dim added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D28981#653908, @mclow.lists wrote:

> > In https://reviews.llvm.org/rL279744, __throw_XXX() functions were 
> > introduced, partially for compatibility with software compiled against 
> > libstdc++.
>
> You're working from a false premise.  These functions were not added for 
> compatibility with libstdc++, but rather to encapsulate the mechanism for 
> throwing an exception - to localize the changes needed to support 
> `-fno-exceptions`


Ok, I was mistaken about the premise, but by accident (or by their 
self-evidentness) the names are still shared with the GNU names.  It would be 
nice to have some way of making them semi-compatible.  Alternatively, we could 
rename them, but that would be more churn, I guess.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D28981



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to