rjmccall added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29739#673933, @tigerleapgorge wrote:
> Hi John, > > Here is the most recent discussion I can find on cfe-dev. > “I'm guessing that Objective-C/C++ is kind of passe, so nobody is really > interested in modernizing it” > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2016-December/051844.html > > As far as I am aware, there appears to be no strong reason to bump or not to > bump ObjC++. It certainly simplifies the message to say that we've changed the default C++ dialect to C++11 across the board. That should apply to ObjC++ as well. I would not describe ObjC++ as passé; it's a very important language for Apple developers. It is likely that the Rewriter generates C++98-only code. I believe the Rewriter is no longer being actively maintained; I'm not sure we're ready to propose removing it yet, but if there are specific problems with those tests, I think it makes some sense to just pass -std=gnu++98 for them. John. https://reviews.llvm.org/D29739 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
