watsond updated this revision to Diff 90087.
watsond marked an inline comment as done.
watsond added a comment.
Fixed logic error, added enum test case
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29858
Files:
clang-tidy/misc/RedundantExpressionCheck.cpp
test/clang-tidy/misc-redundant-expression.cpp
Index: test/clang-tidy/misc-redundant-expression.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/clang-tidy/misc-redundant-expression.cpp
+++ test/clang-tidy/misc-redundant-expression.cpp
@@ -321,6 +321,8 @@
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:15: warning: logical expression is always
true
if (X <= 10 || X >= 11) return 1;
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:15: warning: logical expression is always
true
+ if (X != 7 || X != 14) return 1;
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:14: warning: logical expression is always
true
if (X < 7 && X < 6) return 1;
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:9: warning: expression is redundant
@@ -422,6 +424,8 @@
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:16: warning: logical expression is always
false
if (C == Red && C != Red) return 1;
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:16: warning: logical expression is always
false
+ if (C != Red || C != Yellow) return 1;
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:16: warning: logical expression is always
true
// Should not match.
if (C == Red || C == Yellow) return 1;
Index: clang-tidy/misc/RedundantExpressionCheck.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang-tidy/misc/RedundantExpressionCheck.cpp
+++ clang-tidy/misc/RedundantExpressionCheck.cpp
@@ -239,6 +239,11 @@
(OpcodeRHS == BO_LT || OpcodeRHS == BO_LE))
return true;
+ // Handle cases where constants are different but both ops are !=, like:
+ // x != 5 || x != 10
+ if (OpcodeLHS == BO_NE && OpcodeRHS == BO_NE)
+ return true;
+
return false;
}
Index: test/clang-tidy/misc-redundant-expression.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/clang-tidy/misc-redundant-expression.cpp
+++ test/clang-tidy/misc-redundant-expression.cpp
@@ -321,6 +321,8 @@
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:15: warning: logical expression is always true
if (X <= 10 || X >= 11) return 1;
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:15: warning: logical expression is always true
+ if (X != 7 || X != 14) return 1;
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:14: warning: logical expression is always true
if (X < 7 && X < 6) return 1;
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:9: warning: expression is redundant
@@ -422,6 +424,8 @@
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:16: warning: logical expression is always false
if (C == Red && C != Red) return 1;
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:16: warning: logical expression is always false
+ if (C != Red || C != Yellow) return 1;
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:16: warning: logical expression is always true
// Should not match.
if (C == Red || C == Yellow) return 1;
Index: clang-tidy/misc/RedundantExpressionCheck.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang-tidy/misc/RedundantExpressionCheck.cpp
+++ clang-tidy/misc/RedundantExpressionCheck.cpp
@@ -239,6 +239,11 @@
(OpcodeRHS == BO_LT || OpcodeRHS == BO_LE))
return true;
+ // Handle cases where constants are different but both ops are !=, like:
+ // x != 5 || x != 10
+ if (OpcodeLHS == BO_NE && OpcodeRHS == BO_NE)
+ return true;
+
return false;
}
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits