================
@@ -1270,77 +1270,21 @@ exit:
; MODULE: attributes #[[ATTR1:[0-9]+]] = { convergent nocallback nounwind }
; MODULE: attributes #[[ATTR2:[0-9]+]] = { convergent nocallback nofree
nounwind willreturn }
; MODULE: attributes #[[ATTR3:[0-9]+]] = { nocallback nofree nosync nounwind
willreturn memory(inaccessiblemem: write) }
-; MODULE: attributes #[[ATTR4]] = { "kernel" }
-; MODULE: attributes #[[ATTR5]] = { nosync memory(none) }
+; MODULE: attributes #[[ATTR4]] = { "kernel" "nvvm.kernel" }
+; MODULE: attributes #[[ATTR5]] = { "kernel" }
+; MODULE: attributes #[[ATTR6]] = { nosync memory(none) }
;.
; CGSCC: attributes #[[ATTR0]] = { "llvm.assume"="ompx_aligned_barrier" }
; CGSCC: attributes #[[ATTR1:[0-9]+]] = { convergent nocallback nounwind }
; CGSCC: attributes #[[ATTR2:[0-9]+]] = { convergent nocallback nofree
nounwind willreturn }
; CGSCC: attributes #[[ATTR3:[0-9]+]] = { nocallback nofree nosync nounwind
willreturn memory(inaccessiblemem: write) }
-; CGSCC: attributes #[[ATTR4]] = { "kernel" }
-; CGSCC: attributes #[[ATTR5]] = { nosync memory(none) }
+; CGSCC: attributes #[[ATTR4]] = { "kernel" "nvvm.kernel" }
----------------
AlexMaclean wrote:
I agree that `"omp_kernel"` seems like a much better name for the meaning we're
currently signifying with the `"kernel"` attribute.
> Realistically this should be a calling convention and not an attribute, but
> there's a lot of historical cruft around it.
@jhuber6 are you saying that the `"kernel"` attribute should be a calling
convention? or that `"nvvm.kernel"` should be (similar to `amdgpu_kernel`)?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119261
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
