sammccall marked an inline comment as done. sammccall added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30685#695284, @hokein wrote:
> > We may want to track individual occurrences (line number, full type info) > > and aggregate this during mapreduce, but that's not done here. > > Seems reasonable. So we will introduce a new structure to track these > occurrences? Or reuse the `SymbolInfo::Signals`? These aren't really signals, but they're more like map-value than map-key. I suspect it's another new struct. Fortunately we don't actually need it yet. https://reviews.llvm.org/D30685 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
