================ @@ -2509,6 +2509,20 @@ bool Sema::DiagnoseEmptyLookup(Scope *S, CXXScopeSpec &SS, LookupResult &R, DC = DC->getLookupParent(); } + // Check whether a similar function-like macro exists and suggest it ---------------- StarOne01 wrote:
Hey, thanks for asking, let me explain myself. If i understand it right, [that particular conditional statement](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang%2Flib%2FSema%2FSemaExpr.cpp#L2525-L2526) should get executed for this: ```c int main(){ int var1 = 63; int out = var; } ``` and should be skipped for: ```c int main(){ int var1 = 63; int out = notFound; } ``` but the problem is that the conditional statement gets executed for **both the cases**, so when i put the new check somewhere below it, the control _never_ reaches the new check. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123495 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits