================
@@ -2509,6 +2509,20 @@ bool Sema::DiagnoseEmptyLookup(Scope *S, CXXScopeSpec
&SS, LookupResult &R,
DC = DC->getLookupParent();
}
+ // Check whether a similar function-like macro exists and suggest it
----------------
StarOne01 wrote:
Hey, thanks for asking, let me explain myself.
If i understand it right, [that particular conditional
statement](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang%2Flib%2FSema%2FSemaExpr.cpp#L2525-L2526)
should get executed for this:
```c
int main(){
int var1 = 63;
int out = var;
}
```
and should be skipped for:
```c
int main(){
int var1 = 63;
int out = notFound;
}
```
but the problem is that the conditional statement gets executed for **both the
cases**, so when i put the new check somewhere below it, the control _never_
reaches the new check.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123495
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
