hfinkel added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30415#700534, @nemanjai wrote:
> This seems to change the relationship between -m[no-]altivec and > -f[no-]altivec which has been kind of contentious for a while. Can you add a > note as to whether the new behaviour matches the GCC behaviour. Also, perhaps > @echristo might want to chime in as to whether this is the desired behaviour > or not. Why do you say this? It only seems to affect whether the syntax extensions can be disabled via the appropriate flag. https://reviews.llvm.org/D30415 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
