hfinkel added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30923#700696, @rnk wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30923#700626, @hfinkel wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30923#700620, @thakis wrote: > > > > > Maybe it should have some "to suppress the warning, do X" fixit? > > > > > > I think we should at least include how many bits the field should have to > > fix the problem (pointing to the relevant field definition certainly seems > > helpful). > > > Agreed, I was just hacking that together. :) > > Do you think it's worth indicating that the error can be suppressed with an > explicit cast, or is that wasted space? What might this look like? Also, I don't see a regression test for this. https://reviews.llvm.org/D30923 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
