jaykang10 added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30810#701132, @ahatanak wrote:
> Actually, it's not a mis-compile. The record layout shows that there is a > padding before field f2 and f2 starts at byte 16. So using "store <4 x > float>" doesn't overwrite the field. It depends on float3's alignment. I guess the float3's alignment is 16 on your target so there is a padding bytes before f2 to be aligned by 16. If you add __attribute__((packed)) on struct type, you could see overwrite. https://reviews.llvm.org/D30810 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
