bwendling wrote: @nickdesaulniers I understand what you're saying, and it was addressed in the original patch. I do my best to carry the signed-ness of the variables through to the end so that the checks work out (i.e. the checks for negatives aren't removed after optimizations, which they would be if the results were unsigned).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122198 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
