================
@@ -338,6 +338,13 @@ void aix::Linker::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const
JobAction &JA,
CmdArgs.push_back("-lpthread");
}
const char *Exec = Args.MakeArgString(ToolChain.GetLinkerPath());
+
+// Required for 64-bit atomic operations used in sanitizer runtimes
+// (e.g., sanitizer_common's atomic utilities). On 32-bit AIX, these
+// are not natively supported, necessitating linkage with -latomic.
+ if (Sanitize.hasAnySanitizer() && IsArch32Bit) {
+ CmdArgs.push_back("-latomic");
----------------
hubert-reinterpretcast wrote:
re: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125388/files#r1945365836:
> Our implementation in AIX.cpp follows the established behavior in the LLVM
> community codebase.
Ignoring the lack of elaboration on how exactly placing this logic in `AIX.cpp`
"follows the established behavior in the LLVM community codebase". The
statement ignores the fact that the majority of `linkSanitizerRuntimeDeps` is
code that is conditional based on platforms. For example:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/f7294776570e125b94bb5625905cbc57a4956760/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/CommonArgs.cpp#L1452-L1454
> While IBM’s downstream has opted to centralize similar logic in
> clang::tools::driver::linkSanitizerRuntimeDeps
The characterization that it is "IBM's downstream" that opted to centralize the
logic in said function is misleading. The _LLVM community_ had created said
function for logic associated with linking in dependencies for static sanitizer
components; IBM's downstream followed with that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125388
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
