alexfh added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D31308#709709, @mgehre wrote:
> Thanks for your feedback, Eugene! > > I'm not sure if it would be helpful to have this check in both ways. I did a > code search for "not_eq", "bitand" and "and_eq" > on github, and their usage seems to be a clear minority. > > So I would propose to keep the features as-is for now, > change the name to readability-operators-representation, and then later > (someone else?) might also add an option > for making this work the other way around. Would that be ok for you? > > Were you refering to https://reviews.llvm.org/D25195 ("[lit] Fix FormatError > on individual test timeout")? Nope, "PR" notation is used to reference bugs ("Problem Reports", PRobably): http://llvm.org/PR25195 Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D31308 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
