NoQ accepted this revision. NoQ added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
> There are several undetected "TODO: loss of precision" right now in the tests > that I would like to fix. I think it's a good idea to have `// no-warning` comments as well when testing for lack of false positives. I've a feeling that the original false positive that you've been fixing initially has disappeared from the final tests (we've got stuff with unsigned long += int, but large types behave quite differently when it comes to integral promotion). If i'm wrong, please commit :) Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D25596 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
