bradfier added inline comments.
================ Comment at: include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.def:95 LANGOPT(ObjC2 , 1, 0, "Objective-C 2") +LANGOPT(Java , 1, 0, "Java") BENIGN_LANGOPT(ObjCDefaultSynthProperties , 1, 0, ---------------- arphaman wrote: > I don't think we should have a `Java` lang option, since Clang is not > actually a Java frontend. Maybe another option like `LogicalShiftOperators` > will work better? That seems reasonable. C and C++ have `>>>` or `<<<` operators as part of CUDA extensions though, so maybe the full `LogicalShiftAssignOperators` is more precise? Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D31652 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
