On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Alex Lorenz via Phabricator via cfe-commits <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> arphaman added a comment. > > Ah, I see. I guess if `static` is removed the warning will go away. Thanks! > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D29877 > > I would have appreciated a heads-up here, since libc++ no longer builds with warnings-as-errors. include/memory: namespace __has_pointer_type_imp { template <class _Up> static __two __test(...); template <class _Up> static char __test(typename _Up::pointer* = 0); } template <class _Tp> struct __has_pointer_type : public integral_constant<bool, sizeof(__has_pointer_type_imp::__test<_Tp>(0)) == 1> { }; That first function is not really "unused" (though clang now claims that it is) -- Marshall
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
