Could you confirm if it is right fix? On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:29 PM NAKAMURA Takumi via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: chapuni > Date: Thu Apr 13 22:16:48 2017 > New Revision: 300303 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=300303&view=rev > Log: > clang/test/CoverageMapping/unused_names.c: Relax an expression for > targeting PECOFF. > > Modified: > cfe/trunk/test/CoverageMapping/unused_names.c > > Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CoverageMapping/unused_names.c > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CoverageMapping/unused_names.c?rev=300303&r1=300302&r2=300303&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > --- cfe/trunk/test/CoverageMapping/unused_names.c (original) > +++ cfe/trunk/test/CoverageMapping/unused_names.c Thu Apr 13 22:16:48 2017 > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ > // RUN: FileCheck -check-prefix=SYSHEADER -input-file %t %s > > // CHECK-DAG: @__profc_bar > -// CHECK-DAG: @__llvm_prf_nm = private constant {{.*}}, section > "{{.*}}__llvm_prf_names" > +// CHECK-DAG: @__llvm_prf_nm = private constant {{.*}}, section > "{{.*__llvm_prf_names|.*lprfn}}" > > // These are never instantiated, so we shouldn't get counters for them. > // > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
