================
@@ -18,9 +18,12 @@
using namespace clang;
using namespace clang::CIRGen;
-CIRGenFunctionInfo *CIRGenFunctionInfo::create() {
- // For now we just create an empty CIRGenFunctionInfo.
- CIRGenFunctionInfo *fi = new CIRGenFunctionInfo();
+CIRGenFunctionInfo *CIRGenFunctionInfo::create(CanQualType resultType) {
+ void *buffer = operator new(totalSizeToAlloc<ArgInfo>(1));
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
> I couldn't find any instances of ASTContext::Allocate being used in the
> classic codegen. Is it safe to use it here?
THAT I'm not sure of. I was hoping that pinging the codegen codeowners would
bring us some clarity :)
That being `delete` instead of `operator delete` (or just `new` here...) don't
necessarily match.
That said, I'd probably push for a range-for implementation of that, else it
would sound good to me. It sounds like someone in the incubator noticed this
at one point :):
```
for (CIRGenFuncInfo *FI : FunctionInfos) {
delete FI;
}
```
THOUGH Playing with it, I realize that there is some problem with the
implementation of FoldingSetIterator that makes that not work right... perhaps
someone needs to fix THAT too :D
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135552
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
