dexonsmith added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D32724#747728, @aprantl wrote:
> Is it the right solution to use the module hash for correctness, or should > the mismatch of the serialized langopts trigger a module rebuild and the > module hash is only there to tune the performance/disk size tradeoff? I'm not sure if there is (or should be) a hard-and-fast rule, but certainly in this case changing the hash SGTM. Otherwise, users toggling back and forth between build configurations would have to rebuild the modules each time. https://reviews.llvm.org/D32724 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
