BillyONeal added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33021#750831, @mclow.lists wrote:
> FWIW, I think this is a language change that core got wrong, and it has > already come back to bite us. (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28527) Hmm.... we actually took steps to do the opposite in std::copy -- to use memcpy even in the presence of volatile -- as a result of this change. It looks like Core wasn't a fan of doing this either, but that the Itanium ABI forced their hand. https://reviews.llvm.org/D33021 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
