================
@@ -1432,14 +1432,26 @@ void
NumericLiteralParser::ParseNumberStartingWithZero(SourceLocation TokLoc) {
Diags.Report(TokLoc, DiagId);
++s;
DigitsBegin = s;
- SawOctalPrefix = true;
+ radix = 8;
+ s = SkipOctalDigits(s);
+ if (s == ThisTokEnd) {
+ // Done
+ } else if ((isHexDigit(*s) && *s != 'e' && *s != 'E' && *s != '.') &&
+ !isValidUDSuffix(LangOpts, StringRef(s, ThisTokEnd - s))) {
+ Diags.Report(Lexer::AdvanceToTokenCharacter(TokLoc, s - ThisTokBegin, SM,
+ LangOpts),
+ diag::err_invalid_digit)
+ << StringRef(s, 1) << 1;
+ hadError = true;
+ }
+ // Other suffixes will be diagnosed by the caller.
+ return;
}
auto _ = llvm::make_scope_exit([&] {
// If we still have an octal value but we did not see an octal prefix,
// diagnose as being an obsolescent feature starting in C2y.
- if (radix == 8 && LangOpts.C2y && !SawOctalPrefix && !hadError &&
- !IsSingleZero)
+ if (radix == 8 && LangOpts.C2y && !hadError && !IsSingleZero)
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
Do we have tests showing `00.` , `01.` `0E1` etc do not produce extension
warnings?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141695
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
