philnik777 wrote:

> This looks fine. The meaning is clear. (If anything, the C++ standard should 
> have a better way to talk about "partial or explicit specializations")

Given that the whole argument to change this is that it's closer to the 
standard wording I don't see how the current change makes sense. It's just as 
technically incorrect as the old wording.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143839
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to