Bigcheese wrote:

> LGTM. I think I would slightly prefer for 
> `DependencyScanningWorkerFilesystem` to accept the entire service instead of 
> its members (for the same reasons we do that in the worker, action, etc.)

I changed this, although now the tests need a service. I don't think that's a 
big deal as real use always has a service. It also required moving stuff out of 
the header as the service includes the vfs, so the service can't be a complete 
type in the vfs header.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144000
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to