malhar1995 marked 2 inline comments as done.
malhar1995 added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D32449#760141, @NoQ wrote:

> Thanks! Your code looks very clear now, and it seems correct to me.
>
> One last thing we definitely should do here would be add regression tests for 
> the new functionality. I guess you already have your tests, otherwise you 
> wouldn't know if your code works, so you'd just need to append them to the 
> patch, somewhere at the bottom of `test/Analysis/pthreadlock.c`, and make 
> sure that `make -j4 check-clang-analysis` passes. Ideally, we should cover as 
> many branches as possible.
>
> A few ideas of what to test (you might have thought about most of them 
> already, and i expect them to actually work by just looking at what your code 
> accomplishes):
>
> - What we can/cannot do with the mutex in the failed-to-be-destroyed state, 
> depending on the state of the mutex before destruction was attempted.
> - What we can/cannot do with the mutex in each of the "Schrodinger" states - 
> in particular, do we display the double-destroy warning in such cases?
> - How return-symbol death races against resolving success of the destroy 
> operation: what if the programmer first tries to destroy mutex, then uses the 
> mutex, then checks the return value?
> - Are you sure we cannot `assert(lstate)` on line 137? - a test could be 
> added that would cause such assertion to fail if someone tries to impose it.
>
>   Apart from that, i guess it'd be good to use more informative variable 
> names in a few places (see inline comments), and fix the formatting, i.e. 
> spaces and line breaks (should be easy with `clang-format`). Also you 
> shouldn't add the `.DS_Store` files :) And then we'd accept and commit this 
> patch.


Dear Dr. Artem,

Thank you so much for such a detailed review. I'll work on addressing these 
comments ASAP and reach out to you in case I have any queries.

Regards,
Malhar Thakkar


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D32449



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to