bcardosolopes wrote: > I have concerns about the CIR representation here. I think we should be > aligning our representation of complex operations with the MLIR complex > dialect ... We'll still need to go to the memory representation when it gets > lowered to LLVM IR, but I would like to keep it higher level until then
+1, I think this is a reasonable approach! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144235 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
