yronglin wrote:
> A couple of quick notes:
>
> * This is my first LLVM PR, so if there are any issues with code style or
> conventions, please let me know!
> * I'm not entirely satisfied with the `VD->getName().starts_with("__range")`
> check, but it was the most reliable approach I found. Walking up the AST from
> the node didn’t seem feasible (likely due to optimizations?) and I noticed
> that pattern here:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/075cb691a5e810f7114369c67b475dfd9127d4af/clang/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp#L2481-L2485
Thanks for you fix!
Maybe we can use `isInLifetimeExtendingContext()` instead of check the
`__range` variable name. We usually get into an `LifetimeExtendingContex` in
Sema. FYI, the initial PR is https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76361.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145164
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
