TiborGY wrote: > I feel like this is a solution that can grow out of hand very easily. IMO the > better solution would be to have `-Wmissing-noreturn` place a `[[noreturn]]` > into the AST to avoid incorrect follow-up diagnostics.
I agree, in principle I would expect Clang to be able to prove (in simple cases) that a function cannot return, and then treat them -as-if they were marked as `[[noreturn]]` in the source code, not just for purposes of diagnostics but also optimization. Suppressing the `-Wreturn-type` warning does not achieve that. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145166 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
