Typz added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp:196
+           FormatStyle::BCIS_AfterColonAndComma) &&
+      (State.Column + State.Line->Last->TotalLength - Previous.TotalLength >
+           getColumnLimit(State) ||
----------------
djasper wrote:
> Why can you drop the "+2" here?
> 
> Also, I'd like to structure this so we have to duplicate less of the logic. 
> But I am not really sure it's possible.
the +2 here was needed to keep identifiers aligned when breaking after colon 
but before the command (e.g. the 4th combination, not defined anymore):

  Foo() :
      field(1)
    , field(2)


================
Comment at: lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp:196
+           FormatStyle::BCIS_AfterColonAndComma) &&
+      (State.Column + State.Line->Last->TotalLength - Previous.TotalLength >
+           getColumnLimit(State) ||
----------------
Typz wrote:
> djasper wrote:
> > Why can you drop the "+2" here?
> > 
> > Also, I'd like to structure this so we have to duplicate less of the logic. 
> > But I am not really sure it's possible.
> the +2 here was needed to keep identifiers aligned when breaking after colon 
> but before the command (e.g. the 4th combination, not defined anymore):
> 
>   Foo() :
>       field(1)
>     , field(2)
I can avoid some duplication like this,m but i am not convinced it helps :

  const FormatToken &ColonToken =
      Style.BreakConstructorInitializers != FormatStyle::BCIS_AfterColon
                                            ? Current : Previous;
  if (ColonToken.is(TT_CtorInitializerColon) &&
      (State.Column + State.Line->Last->TotalLength - ColonToken.TotalLength +
               (Style.BreakConstructorInitializers !=
                    FormatStyle::BCIS_AfterColon ? 2 : 0) >
           getColumnLimit(State) ||
       State.Stack.back().BreakBeforeParameter) &&
      (Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine != FormatStyle::SFS_All ||
       Style.BreakConstructorInitializers != FormatStyle::BCIS_BeforeColon ||
       Style.ColumnLimit != 0))
    return true;

what do you think?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D32479



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to