================
@@ -187,12 +202,12 @@ void test_variadic_constructor_bounds() {
// The constructor has 1 formal parameter (T* p) plus ellipsis, but we pass
multiple args
// This should trigger the bounds checking issue in
handleSmartPointerConstructorArguments
int* raw_ptr = new int(42);
- process_variadic_smart_ptr(VariadicSmartPtr<int>(raw_ptr, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5));
+ process_variadic_smart_ptr(unique_ptr<int>(raw_ptr, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5));
(void)malloc_ptr;
} // expected-warning {{Potential leak of memory pointed to by 'malloc_ptr'}}
expected-note {{Potential leak of memory pointed to by 'malloc_ptr'}}
----------------
NagyDonat wrote:
```suggestion
} // expected-warning {{Potential leak of memory pointed to by 'malloc_ptr'}}
// expected-note@-1 {{Potential leak of memory pointed to by 'malloc_ptr'}}
```
It is possible to move an `expected-` markers onto a different line (by adding
`@` + relative line number) and it may be a nice touch on long lines like this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152751
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits