================
@@ -676,6 +774,58 @@
BuiltinTypeDeclBuilder::addHandleConstructorFromImplicitBinding() {
.finalize();
}
+BuiltinTypeDeclBuilder &BuiltinTypeDeclBuilder::addCreateFromBinding() {
----------------
bogner wrote:
I think Alex was trying to say that the implementations of the builder
functions are really similar. That is, would it be worth it to abstract out a
helper along the lines of
```c++
BuiltinTypeDeclBuilder &addStaticResoureConstructor(StringRef Name, StringRef
Builtin, ArrayRef<std::pair<StringRef, QualType>> Params);
```
I think it might clean this up a bit, but I'm also okay with waiting for some
of the other initialization functions to come in before settling on the best
abstraction here. Up to you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/155866
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
