tbaederr wrote:

`UnsignedOrNone` just means we assert there when passing `-1`. With a full 
`std::optional<unsigned>` the value would just underflow and the value we use 
later would've been wrong. The incorrect handling of negative values has 
nothing to do with `UnsignedOrNone`.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159579
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to