ChuanqiXu9 wrote: > > > If reflection is 'experimental' anything we change that breaks > > > serialization/etc is perfectly fine. > > > > > > If this is the decision, I think it will be better to explicitly diagnose > > for any code path that triggers serialization > > That seems pretty novel? We don't typically diagnose that sort of thing.
I just think, if users triggers serialization with reflection now, it is better to diagnose immediately instead of continue silently and the user may meet odd problems... https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164692 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
