================
@@ -136,11 +136,9 @@ getRepresentation(const std::vector<llvm::StringRef>
&Config,
template <typename T>
static bool isAnyOperatorEnabled(const std::vector<llvm::StringRef> &Config,
const T &Operators) {
- for (const auto &[traditional, alternative] : Operators) {
- if (!getRepresentation(Config, traditional, alternative).empty())
- return true;
- }
- return false;
+ return llvm::any_of(Operators, [&](const auto &Op) {
+ return !getRepresentation(Config, Op.first, Op.second).empty();
+ });
----------------
vbvictor wrote:
Arguably less readability than `for (const auto &[traditional, alternative] :
Operators)`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/167134
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
