andykaylor wrote: > Note for the future @andykaylor @bcardosolopes I believe we should keep apart > 2 versions: `cir.scf.try_call` with regions (sctructured control flow) and > `cir.try_call` with blocks as destinations. Might be the similar issue for > other operations, we should try to separate structured and unstructured > paradigms.
@xlauko In general, I agree with what you're saying, though in this case there is no direct structured equivalent. Before flattening the `cir.call` just appears inside a try block and has no specified control flow of its own. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165303 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
