vgvassilev wrote: > @vgvassilev Would you mind please reviewing this for viability? It's a very > small change, but I can't be sure it's the correct way to go about this. > We're aiming to solve this problem #164885 which currently prevents > `clang::Interpreter` from using boost.asio.
This is not the way to go. We should fix this issue in the tentative parsing logic around: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/e04c01bcc91226d632f81bd3290c180deb0b6db8/clang/lib/Parse/ParseTentative.cpp#L56-L63 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169272 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
