kikairoya wrote:

> That's great! Does this, together with #168170, address the overall problem 
> in #135910, or are there many other issues remaining in order to fix that 
> (other than reverting my old clang change)?

Neither of this nor #168170 is directly related to #135910 itself.
These are prerequisites for libc++'s ABI checking 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/135910#issuecomment-2901310436 , 
and another patch and checking functionality itself are still required to 
upstream.

For #135910 , I already have a "functional" local patch (with exporting nested 
classes), but I feel that I should try to find more edge cases.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168171
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to