mcrosier added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35577#818936, @kparzysz wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35577#817944, @echristo wrote: > > > "Should this just be part of the tuning for the hexagon backend and not > > options at all" > > > > > I don't think we need separate options to control jump tables and lookup > tables: one option to enable/disable the use of memory tables would be > sufficient. I don't have an objection to this direction (i.e., disable the lookup-table optimization when -fno-jump-tables is specified), so long as other are in agreement. https://reviews.llvm.org/D35577 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
