================
@@ -901,12 +901,25 @@ def UncheckedReturn : Checker<"UncheckedReturn">,
   Dependencies<[SecuritySyntaxChecker]>,
   Documentation<HasDocumentation>;
 
-def DeprecatedOrUnsafeBufferHandling :
-  Checker<"DeprecatedOrUnsafeBufferHandling">,
-  HelpText<"Warn on uses of unsecure or deprecated buffer manipulating "
-           "functions">,
-  Dependencies<[SecuritySyntaxChecker]>,
-  Documentation<HasDocumentation>;
+def DeprecatedOrUnsafeBufferHandling
+    : Checker<"DeprecatedOrUnsafeBufferHandling">,
+      HelpText<"Warn on uses of unsecure or deprecated buffer manipulating "
+               "functions">,
+      Dependencies<[SecuritySyntaxChecker]>,
+      CheckerOptions<
+          [CmdLineOption<
+               String, "ReportMode",
+               "Controls when warnings are reported. \"all\" reports all "
+               "unsafe "
+               "functions regardless of C standard or Annex K availability. "
+               "\"actionable\" only reports when Annex K is available (C11 "
+               "with "
----------------
steakhal wrote:

I think you should re-flow the comments. Its weird to see a single word in a 
dedicated line.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168704
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to