aaron.ballman added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33672#827513, @xazax.hun wrote:
> Even though it is not undefined behavior in C, it can still cause surprising > behavior for the users. I think maybe putting it into the optin package > instead of cplusplus is better. What do you think? I think it's reasonable to diagnose in C when converting the value would lose precision, so long as the check implements that behavior properly for C. That would suggest it belongs somewhere other than cplusplus. https://reviews.llvm.org/D33672 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
