ilya-biryukov added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35894#829190, @malaperle wrote:
> @Nebiroth I think it's OK to put this on hold until we make the "semantic" > hover and figure out how to have both. From our perspective, this is going > beyond parity of what we had before but it's seems like the right thing to do. BTW, just noticed that VS Code shows the range reported by `findDefinitions` when you hover over a symbol and holding Ctrl. Would calling `findDefinitions` help you to do the same thing? That would allow to get closer to feature parity with CDT without implementing semantic hover in clangd. https://reviews.llvm.org/D35894 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
