================
@@ -809,25 +809,130 @@ Code Completion
 
 Static Analyzer
 ---------------
-- The Clang Static Analyzer now handles parenthesized initialization.
-  (#GH148875)
-- ``__datasizeof`` (C++) and ``_Countof`` (C) no longer cause a failed 
assertion
-  when given an operand of VLA type. (#GH151711)
 
-New features
-^^^^^^^^^^^^
+New checkers or options
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+- Introduced the ``alpha.core.StoreToImmutable`` checker to catch writes to
+  immutable memory. See the `documentation
+  
<https://clang.llvm.org/docs/analyzer/checkers.html#alpha-core-storetoimmutable-c-c>`__.
+  (#GH150417)
+- Introduced the ``core.NullPointerArithm`` checker to catch arithmetic on
+  null pointers. See the `documentation
+  
<https://clang.llvm.org/docs/analyzer/checkers.html#core-nullpointerarithm-c-c>`__.
+  (#GH157129)
+- The ``core.CallAndMessage`` checker gained a new checker option called
+  ``ArgPointeeInitializednessComplete``, enabling suppression of diagnostics
+  of this checker in case at least some parts of the object was initialized.
+  By default it's disabled. (#GH164600)
 
 Crash and bug fixes
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
 - Fixed a crash in the static analyzer that when the expression in an
-  ``[[assume(expr)]]`` attribute was enclosed in parentheses.  (#GH151529)
+  ``[[assume(expr)]]`` attribute was enclosed in parentheses. (#GH151529)
+- Fixed an assertion failure of ``[[assume(expr)]]`` when the expression
+  couldn't be folded into a constant by the engine. (#GH151854)
+- ``__datasizeof`` (C++) and ``_Countof`` (C) no longer cause a failed 
assertion
+  when given an operand of VLA type. (#GH151711)
+- Sometimes the ``unix.Malloc`` checker asserted when constructing a report 
under
+  rare circumstances. (#GH149754)
+- The ``core.StackAddressEscape`` checker was crashing if a lambda or
+  Objective-C block expression captured itself. (#GH169208)
+- Fixed an assertion in the ``alpha.unix.cstring`` checker package when
+  non-default address-spaces were used in ``memcpy``. (#GH153498)
+- The engine sometimes crashed when modeling a parenthesis initializer-list
+  expression. (#GH147686)
+- `crosscheck-with-z3 
<https://clang.llvm.org/docs/analyzer/user-docs/Options.html#crosscheck-with-z3>`__
+  config option sometimes crashed. (#GH168034)
+- The ``alpha.core.StdVariant`` checker sometimes crashed when floating-point
+  values were involved. (#GH167341)
+- Hardened the engine for supporting platforms where different address-space
+  pointers might have different sizes. (#GH151370)
+- The ``core.builtin.BuiltinFunctions`` checker crashed when passing
+  ``_BitInt(N)`` or ``__int128_t`` to ``__builtin_add_overflow`` or similar
+  checked arithmetic builtin functions. (#GH173795)
 
 Improvements
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
+- The `expand-macros 
<https://clang.llvm.org/docs/analyzer/user-docs/Options.html#expand-macros>`__
+  analyzer config option now formats the macro expansions using LLVM-style
+  clang-format. (#GH154743)
+- ``[[clang::suppress]]`` now can suppress diagnostics within primary 
templates.
+  (#GH168954)
+- Improved the false-positive suppression for ``std::unique_ptr`` and
+  ``std::shared_ptr`` in the ``unix.Malloc`` checker. (#GH60896)
+- Improved the false-positive suppression for ``unix.Malloc`` on protobuf code.
+  (#GH162124)
+- Supporting parenthesized initialization. (#GH148875)
----------------
steakhal wrote:

I think its good to mention tickets that were reported by 3rd parties and 
fixed. In one way I find it honouring the submission by mentioning it being 
fixed.

As the other about protobuf supression, I think thats a fairly widely used 
framework and this issue affected it quite a bit from what I can see. Calling 
out "protobuf" might get some users to give another look if this was the only 
blocker.

So far I didn't see much guidance on what qualifies for a mention in the 
release notes, so I suppose it's up to us how deep we want to go.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/174450
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to