AaronBallman wrote: > > I'd like to land this in two weeks if no objections come in. > > Clang 22 branches in a few days, and this should not land before that IMO. > Especially given that there was no discussion (that I'm aware of) about > breaking the previously valid AST invariant following:
+1, I don't think this change should land for Clang 22; this is changing a long-standing invariant and my experience on the C23 side has been that this invariant is still being assumed in a fair number of places in the compiler. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/172430 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
