================
@@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ class LLVMLoweringInfo {
class CIR_Op<string mnemonic, list<Trait> traits = []> :
Op<CIR_Dialect, mnemonic, traits>, LLVMLoweringInfo {
+ // Should we generate an ABI lowering pattern for this op?
+ bit hasAbiLowering = false;
----------------
andykaylor wrote:
```suggestion
bit hasCXXABILowering = false;
```
I expect to have multiple lowering passes related to ABI, one for the C++ ABI,
one for calling-convention-related ABI, and at least one for other things. I
think it makes sense to keep these separate. At the very least, I would like
the calling convention handling to be dialect agnostic.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/175021
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
