ian-twilightcoder wrote: > Looks good. Thinking along the lines that Cyndy is, should the support for > lld/lto be captured in a resource so we can clean up the > `REQUIRE:`/`UNSUPPORTED:` lines in the test cases?
If somebody else wants to do that, sure 😃. I think this is @abrachet's test? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/174512 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
