ActuallyaDeviloper wrote:

>     * In the X86 backend, **delete the code for minnum lowering** and always 
> treat minnum like minimumnum, which already implements all the required 
> signed zero and nsz handling. The implementation complexity for this change 
> for the X86 backend is literally negative.
* not quite, it's a must to utilize `VRANGE` for `minnum` afterwards from my 
point of view. It's a 1-1 mapping with and without `nsz` so it should be rather 
trivial.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/172012
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to