llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: None (sadan4) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/176057.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst (+1-1) ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst b/clang/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst index b4a7d23e1b2c6..43291ce261645 100644 --- a/clang/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst +++ b/clang/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ libraries such as the Active Template Library (ATL) and Windows Runtime Library (WRL), some template rules have been relaxed or extended in Clang on Windows. The first major semantic difference is that MSVC appears to defer all parsing -an analysis of inline method bodies in class templates until instantiation +and analysis of inline method bodies in class templates until instantiation time. By default on Windows, Clang attempts to follow suit. This behavior is controlled by the ``-fdelayed-template-parsing`` flag. While Clang delays parsing of method bodies, it still parses the bodies *before* template argument `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/176057 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
